4.7 Article

Optimized Fragmentation Improves the Identification of Peptides Cross-Linked by MS-Cleavable Reagents

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 1363-1370

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00947

Keywords

cross-linking mass spectrometry; XLMS; cleavable cross-linker; stepped HCD; DSSO

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund [SFB F3402, P24685-B24, TRP 308-N15, I 3686]
  2. IMP
  3. IMBA
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P24685] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cross-linking mass spectrometry is becoming increasingly popular, and current advances are widening the applicability of the technique so that it can be utilized by nonspecialist laboratories. Specifically, the use of novel mass spectrometry -cleavable (MS-cleavable) reagents dramatically reduces the complexity of the data by providing (i) characteristic reporter ions and (ii) the mass of the individual peptides rather than that of the cross-linked moiety. However, optimum acquisition strategies to obtain the best-quality data for such cross-linkers with higher energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) alone are yet to be achieved. Therefore, we have carefully investigated and optimized MS parameters to facilitate the identification of disuccinimidyl-sulfoxide-based cross-links on HCD-equipped mass spectrometers. From the comparison of nine different fragmentation energies, we chose several stepped-HCD fragmentation methods that were evaluated on a variety of cross-linked proteins. The optimal stepped-HCD method was then directly compared with previously described methods using an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid instrument using a high complexity sample. The final results indicate that our stepped-HCD method is able to identify more cross-links than other methods, mitigating the need for multistage MS-enabled (MSn) instrumentation and alternative dissociation techniques. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXDO11861.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available