4.6 Article

Dietary Inflammatory Index, Pre-Frailty and Frailty Among Older US Adults: Evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2014

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 323-329

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-019-1164-3

Keywords

Nutrition; NHANES; Dietary Inflammatory Index; frailty; pre-frailty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the association between dietary inflammation, pre-frailty and frailty among older US adults. Additionally, effect modification of gender on the association between dietary inflammation and frailty was assessed.DesignStudy data came from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-2014)-a nationally representative, cross-sectional study of adults.ParticipantsThe analytic sample included adults 60 years (n=7,182).MeasurementsDietary Inflammatory Index (DII (R)) scores were calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls; DII was categorized into quintiles from Quintile 1 (Q1) (least inflammatory) to Q5 (most inflammatory). Frailty was assessed by four criteria: exhaustion, weakness, low body mass, and low physical activity. Individuals were then categorized into robust (0 criteria), pre-frail (1-2 criteria), or frail (3-4 criteria). Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the odds of frailty categories (prefrail vs. robust; frail vs. robust).ResultsAfter adjusting for potential confounders, individuals in DII quintile 5 (vs Q1) were more likely to be pre-frail (OR = 1.71; 95% CI: 1.36-2.15) and frail (OR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.02- 2.85). Individuals in Q4 had greater odds of frailty only (OR = 1.82; 95% CI: 1.13, 2.93). No evidence of effect modification by gender on the association of DII and frailty was found.ConclusionThis study expands upon previous evidence of a relationship between dietary inflammation and frailty. When designing nutrition-based frailty interventions, inflammatory properties of diets should be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available