4.5 Article

A multicenter phase II study of temozolomide plus disulfiram and copper for recurrent temozolomide-resistant glioblastoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 142, Issue 3, Pages 537-544

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03125-y

Keywords

Recurrent glioblastoma; Disulfiram; Temozolomide; Copper; Clinical trial

Funding

  1. Cantex Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposePreclinical studies have suggested promising activity for the combination of disulfiram and copper (DSF/Cu) against glioblastoma (GBM) including re-sensitization to temozolomide (TMZ). A previous phase I study demonstrated the safety of combining DSF/Cu with adjuvant TMZ for newly diagnosed GBM. This phase II study aimed to estimate the potential effectiveness of DSF/Cu to re-sensitize recurrent GBM to TMZ.MethodsThis open-label, single-arm phase II study treated recurrent TMZ-resistant GBM patients with standard monthly TMZ plus concurrent daily DSF 80mg PO TID and Cu 1.5mg PO TID. Eligible patients must have progressed after standard chemoradiotherapy and within 3months of the last dose of TMZ. Known isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant or secondary GBMs were excluded. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit (response or stable disease for at least 6months), and safety.ResultsFrom March 2017 to January 2018, 23 recurrent TMZ-resistant GBM patients were enrolled across seven centers, and 21 patients were evaluable for response. The median duration of DSF/Cu was 1.6 cycles (range: 0.1-12.0). The ORR was 0%, but 14% had clinical benefit. Median PFS was 1.7months, and median OS was 7.1months. Only one patient (4%) had dose-limiting toxicity (grade three elevated alanine transaminase).ConclusionsAddition of DSF/Cu to TMZ for TMZ-resistant IDH-wild type GBM appears well tolerated but has limited activity for unselected population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available