4.7 Article

Transport and deposition of colloidal particles on a patterned membrane surface: Effect of cross-flow velocity and the size ratio of particle to surface pattern

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 572, Issue -, Pages 309-319

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.11.011

Keywords

Particle simulation; Patterned membrane; Particle deposition; Membrane fouling; CFD

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [NRF-2018R1A5A1024127]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the transport and deposition of colloidal particles onto a patterned membrane surface are analyzed by both numerical simulation and experiment. The channel Reynolds number (Re) and the size ratio of the particle to the pattern (a/h) are chosen as the major simulation parameters. With an increase in Re and a/h, the number of deposited particles decreases and the rate of permeate flux decline is reduced. Under certain specific combinations of the design parameters, the suspended particles are impeded to access the patterned membrane surface. Based on the particle trajectory analysis, it is claimed that inaccessible zones, where the suspended particles cannot be accessed by the flow, are formed near the patterned membrane surface, with the increase in Re and a/h. Cross-flow microfiltration experiments using a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) particle suspension are also conducted to verify the trend in particle deposition observed in simulation. As the radius of the PMMA particle increases, the number of deposited particles is reduced and the critical flux for the onset of the particle deposition is increased, which qualitatively matches well with simulation. It is found that a patterned membrane can reduce tremendous amounts of colloidal fouling by prohibiting the access of the suspended particles to the membrane surface with the appropriate choice of design parameters such as Re and a/h.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available