4.2 Article

A novel method for determining antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 468, Issue -, Pages 55-60

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2019.03.001

Keywords

Antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis; Glycosylation variants; pHrodo green AM; Cell-based assay; Flow cytometry

Funding

  1. Genentech, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antibody-based therapeutics are powerful tools to treat disease. While their mechanism of action (MOA) always involves binding to a specific target via the Fab region of the antibody, the induction of effector functions through the Fc region of the antibody is equally important for antibody therapeutics designed to deplete tumor cells. By binding of the Fc region to Fc gamma receptors (Fc gamma Rs) on the surface of immune cells or complement factors, antibody therapeutics exert effector functions such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), both of which induce target cell death and aid in the efficacy of treatment. Another major Fc effector function is antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP). ADCP is the mechanism by which antibody-opsonized target cells activate the Fc gamma Rs on the surface of macrophages to induce phagocytosis, resulting in internalization and degradation of the target cell through phagosome acidification. ADCP has been implicated as a major MOA of several biologics, but this activity is difficult to measure in in vitro. Most assays measure the association of target cells and macrophages; however, co-localization can represent cell attachment rather than internalization. Here, we describe the development of a novel method to accurately measure ADCP activity. By labeling target cells with a pH sensitive dye that only fluoresces in mature phagosomes, the ADCP activity of antibody therapeutics can be accurately quantitated via flow cytometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available