4.7 Article

On the estimation of spatially representative plot scale saturated hydraulic conductivity in an agricultural setting

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 570, Issue -, Pages 106-117

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.044

Keywords

Saturated hydraulic conductivity; Local measurements; Spatial variability; Plot-scale estimate

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Funds (FWF) as part of the Vienna Doctoral Programme on Water Resource Systems [DK W1219-N22]
  2. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (PRIN 2015)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spatially representative estimates of saturated hydraulic conductivity, K-s are needed for simulating catchment scale surface runoff and infiltration. Classical methods for measuring K-s are time-consuming so sampling campaigns need to be designed economically. Important insights can be obtained by experiments directed to understand the controls of K-s in an agricultural setting and identify the minimum number of samples required for estimating representative plot scale K-s. In this study, a total of 131 double-ring infiltrometer measurements were made on 12 plots in a small Austrian catchment. A statistical analysis of K, across the catchment suggests K-s to be only slightly influenced by physical and topographical soil characteristics while land use is the main control. The highest values of K-s were observed in arable fields, with a median of about 3 times and a coefficient of variation (CV) of about 75% of those in grassland areas. An uncertainty analysis aimed at determining the minimum number of K-s measurements necessary for estimating the geometric mean of K-s over a given area with a specified accuracy suggests that, beyond a specific and plot-size dependent number of measurements, the benefit of any extra measurement is small. The confidence interval of the geometric mean of K-s decreases with the number of measurements and increases with the size of the plot sampled. Applications of these findings for designing field campaigns are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available