4.7 Article

Acid stress induces cross-protection for cadmium tolerance of multi-stress-tolerant Pichia kudriavzevii by regulating cadmium transport and antioxidant defense system

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 366, Issue -, Pages 151-159

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.101

Keywords

Cross-protection; Acid stress; Cadmium tolerance; Cadmium conjugation; Antioxidant enzyme

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC1600706]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31801520, 31571927]
  3. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-46, CARS-50]
  4. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou of China [201707010300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The toxicity of cadmium (Cd) is the major limitation to its removal using microorganisms. The Cd tolerance of Pichia kudriavzevii was obviously enhanced by acid stress based on multi-stress cross-protection. RNA-Seq showed that most differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the Pentose phosphate pathway, Citrate cycle (TCA cycle), Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis, Peroxisome and Glutathione metabolism were up-regulated by acid stress. The up-regulated expression of genes related to ATP synthesis (GOR1, ALD5, ADH4, ADH6, MDH2, IDH1, IDH2, and ATP19) and Cd transport (GSTY2, GTO2, GLO2, and YOR1), and the improvement of intracellular GSH level and GST activity, reduced the Cd toxicity towards P. kudriavzevii. Cd efflux by YOR1 played a key role in the decline of intracellular Cd level. Acid stress obviously improved the gene expression levels and activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, and CAT), which inhibited the Cd-induced ROS outburst and oxidative damage of proteins and membrane lipids. In addition, the enhanced expression of HSP12 protected P. kudriavzevii from the damage of Cd stress. These results provide some important clues to reconstruct robust strains using for Cd removal in aquatic environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available