4.6 Article

Characterization of Volatile Profiles of Six Popular Edible Mushrooms Using Headspace-Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled with Gas Chromatography Combined with Chemometric Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages 421-429

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.14481

Keywords

brown beech; button; canonical discriminant analysis; enoki; king oyster; oyster; principal component analysis; volatile components; white beech

Funding

  1. R&D project of the Natl. Inst. of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ1258503]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The classification of six mushroom species (white beech, brown beech, button, oyster, king oyster, and enoki mushrooms) was successfully achieved using canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) on volatile metabolite data sets obtained by headspace-solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography (HS-SPME-GC). Twenty-seven major volatile compounds in six edible mushrooms were positively identified by HS-SPME-GC mass spectroscopy. The total volatile content was highest in brown beech mushroom (P < 0.05). Significant difference in volatile profile was observed between brown beach and white beech mushrooms. Button mushroom contained significantly higher contents of benzaldehyde and benzyl alcohol than the other mushrooms (P < 0.05). Oyster mushroom contained 1-octen-3-ol as the most prevalent volatile, representing 67% out of total volatiles. Hexanal (35.0%) and 1-octen-3-ol (22.5%) were the most abundant volatiles found in king oyster. Hexanal (29.1%) was the most prevalent volatile in enoki mushroom only. Several volatile pairs with very high positive correlation in their levels were identified, representing the highest correlation coefficient (r = 0.970) for the pair of t-2-octenal and 2,4-octandienal. CDA was much more efficient than principal component analysis for the differentiation of mushroom species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available