4.4 Article

Population Density, Not Host Competence, Drives Patterns of Disease in an Invaded Community

Journal

AMERICAN NATURALIST
Volume 188, Issue 5, Pages 554-566

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/688402

Keywords

biodiversity; Daphnia; dilution effect; invasive species; multi-host parasites; pathogen

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-1305836]
  2. Division Of Environmental Biology
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1305836] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Generalist parasites can strongly influence interactions between native and invasive species. Host competence can be used to predict how an invasive species will affect community disease dynamics; the addition of a highly competent, invasive host is predicted to increase disease. However, densities of invasive and native species can also influence the impacts of invasive species on community disease dynamics. We examined whether information on host competence alone could be used to accurately predict the effects of an invasive host on disease in native hosts. We first characterized the relative competence of an invasive species and a native host species to a native parasite. Next, we manipulated species composition in mesocosms and found that host competence results did not accurately predict community dynamics. While the invasive host was more competent than the native, the presence of the native (lower competence) host increased disease in the invasive (higher competence) host. To identify potential mechanisms driving these patterns, we analyzed a two-host, one-parasite model parameterized for our system. Our results demonstrate that patterns of disease were primarily driven by relative population densities, mediated by asymmetry in intra-and interspecific competition. Thus, information on host competence alone may not accurately predict how an invasive species will influence disease in native species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available