4.7 Article

Biosorption of radioactive cesium from contaminated water by microalgae Haematococcus pluvialis and Chlorella vulgaris

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 233, Issue -, Pages 83-88

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.022

Keywords

Cesium; Biosorption; Haematococcus pluvialis; Chlorella vulgaris; Bioremediation; Waste treatment

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2017M2A8A5015147]
  2. Nuclear Research and Development Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy [20161520101210]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20161520101210] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biosorption properties of water-soluble radioactive cesium (Cs-137) by microalga Haematococcus pluvialis were evaluated with different cell conditions, and its cesium-uptake rate was compared with that by other microalgae, Chlorella vulgaris and Anabaena sp. Photo-induced H. pluvialis red cyst rapidly removed radioactive cesium from the solution by bioaccumulation. We showed that the effectiveness of Cs-137 uptake is dependent on the specific cell condition of even the same microalgal species. While the H. pluvialis red cyst removed almost 95% of the soluble Cs-137 in 48 h, both H. pluvialis intermediate cells and C. vulgaris showed 90% uptake efficiency of Cs-137 with slow uptake rate. The energy dispersive spectrometer data demonstrated that the cesium uptake acceleration by inducing astaxanthin in H. pluvialis red cyst involves the cesium accumulation through the potassium transport channel. The long-term monitoring experiments of the cesium uptake showed that only 40% of (137)Csremained in collapsed H. pluvialis cell fragments after 12 months.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available