4.7 Article

Growth of Rhodes grass and leaching of ions from seawater neutralized bauxite residues after amendment with gypsum and organic wastes

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 231, Issue -, Pages 596-604

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.083

Keywords

Bauxite residue; Seawater neutralization; Soil formation; Substrate amendments; Leaching

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 32-week leaching column study was carried out in the greenhouse to investigate the effects of incorporation of gypsum, cattle manure, biosolids, gypsum plus cattle manure and gypsum plus biosolids into the topsoil layer (0-10 cm) on growth of Rhodes grass, and on root distribution and chemical and microbial properties in the topsoil and subsoil (10-30 cm) layers of seawater neutralized bauxite residues. The columns were leached for a period of 8 weeks prior to sowing Rhodes grass and during that time the bulk of the salts accumulated during seawater neutralization were leached out. The main cation leached was Na+ and the main balancing anions were Cl- and SO42- During this period the pH of leachates rose from 7 to 8 up to 9-10. At the end of the study, exchangeable Na and pH were lowered in the surface horizon by all treatments with a combination of gypsum plus organic amendments having the greatest effect. The latter treatments also caused a significant decrease in pH, extractable Al and exchangeable Na in the subsoil. Rhodes grass dry matter production followed the order Control < gypsum < cattle manure = gypsum plus cattle manure < biosolids = gypsum plus biosolids. Growth of roots into the subsoil layer was inhibited in the Control and gypsum treatments but when organic amendments were applied, 50% or more of root dry matter was recovered in the subsoil layer. It was concluded that incorporating a combination of gypsum and organic matter into the surface soil is an effective strategy for revegetation of bauxite residue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available