4.4 Article

Unified Hermite Polynomial Model and Its Application in Estimating Non-Gaussian Processes

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS
Volume 145, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001577

Keywords

Non-Gaussian process; Hermite polynomial; Softening process; Hardening process; Unified model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51820105014, 51738001, U1434204, 51421005]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201706370095]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [1053320180507]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-Gaussian processes beset many aspects of structural engineering analysis. To estimate non-Gaussian processes, various third-order Hermite polynomial models have been proposed and widely applied. Different forms of expressions have been proposed for hardening and softening processes in existing Hermite polynomial models, which makes them inconvenient to implement. Furthermore, these models are either too simple to ensure accurate results or too complicated to implement conveniently. Thus, a unified third-order Hermite polynomial model that achieves a good balance between accuracy and convenience for both hardening and softening processes is proposed in this study. Explicit expressions for translations of the marginal distributions between the non-Gaussian and Gaussian processes using the proposed Hermite polynomial model are deduced, and the applicable ranges are provided. The accuracy of the proposed model is demonstrated by comparing the coefficients and estimated moments with those obtained from the moment-matching method. Furthermore, the application of the proposed model in evaluating first passage probability, analyzing fatigue damage, and estimating peak factors of non-Gaussian wind pressure coefficient histories is demonstrated with numerical and practical examples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available