4.5 Article

Effect of the cargo lipophilicity on powder micromeritics properties of drug-loaded solid lipid microparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF DRUG DELIVERY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 614-620

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2019.03.025

Keywords

SLMs; Powder micromeritic properties; Lipophilicity; Interparticle force

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81703431, 81673375]
  2. 111 project [B16047]
  3. Natural Science Fund Project of Guangdong Province [2016A030312013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid lipid microparticles (SLMs) have broad prospect as one of the lipid-based solid drug delivery system (LSDDS). Much attention should be paid to the powder micromeritic properties of SLMs for the strict requirement made by further development into solid preparation. However, the role of formulation factors in powder micromeritics properties still remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate the potential effect of drug lipophilicity on micromeritics properties of the lipophilic drug-loaded SLMs. Salicylic acid (SAA) and Diflunisal (DIF) were chosen as the model drugs for they have great difference on lipophilicity, and Stearic acid (SA) was selected as the model lipid. The two drug-loaded SLMs were investigated for their powder micromeritic and other properties for comparative study. The lipophilicity of drug exhibited difference in powder micromeritic properties of SLMs. SAA-SA had much lower encapsulation efficiency and drug loading with SAA mainly located on the outer layer when compared with DIF-SA, of which the more lipophilic DIF were encapsulated inside. Besides, SAA-SA also showed higher density and lower flowability, which is tended to aggregate. In summary, the SLMs loaded with more lipophilic drug would show better micromeritics properties. The different interparticle force caused by different drug distribution may explain the phenomenon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available