4.3 Article

Perfluoroalkyl substances are inversely associated with coronary heart disease in adults with diabetes

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages 407-412

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2019.02.004

Keywords

Diabetes; Coronary heart disease; Perfluoroalkyl substances; Perfluorooctanoic acid; Perfluorooctane sulfonate; Perfluorononanoic acid

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, United States [U54GM1049]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are environmentally and biologically persistent synthetic environmental contaminants linked to adverse health outcomes. Though null to modest inverse relationships between PFAS and coronary heart disease (CHD) have been reported, studies regarding relationships in high risk populations such as those with diabetes are sparse. We investigated the relationship of PFAS with CHD in persons with diabetes. Methods: Data on 5270 adults, aged >= 20 years, with diabetes were obtained from the C8 Health Project Four PFAS were investigated separately: perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA). Results: In logistic regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, diabetes duration, BMI, smoking, lipids, WBC, CRP, eGFR, uric acid, hemoglobin and iron, all PFAS were inversely associated with CHD, ORs (95% Cls): PFHxS; 0.72 (0.65-0.79), PFOA; 0.90 (0.81-0.96), PFOS; 0.90 (0.81-0.99), PFNA; 0.88 (0.76-1.02). Stratification by chronic kidney disease status revealed similar inverse relationships for those with and without chronic kidney disease. Conclusions: In this cross-sectional study of over 5000 adults with diabetes, PFAS showed inverse associations with CHD. These findings may, if confirmed in future studies, provide new physiologic understanding of CHD prevention strategies. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available