4.5 Article

The use of the PSH-AM in patients with diffuse axonal injury and autonomic dysregulation: A cohort study and review

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 110-117

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.10.018

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury; Diffuse axonal injury; Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity; Autonomic dysregulation

Funding

  1. Dutch Organization for Health Research and Care Innovation (ZonMw) [842004002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: 1) To determine the clinical expression and consequences of autonomic dysregulation in patients with diffuse axonal injury (DAI), and 2) to study the use of the paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity assessment measure (PSH-AM). Methods: Patients clinically diagnosed with autonomic dysregulation were selected from a cohort involving 116 patients with DAI We studied the incidence of autonomic features, treatment, and outcome. In addition a systematic review was performed. Results: Autonomic dysregulation was diagnosed in 19 of 116 (16.4%). Lower age (OR 0.95) and higher DAI grade (OR 7 2) were risk factors for autonomic dysregulation. Autonomic dysregulation was associated with an unfavourable outcome (OR 5.6) and a longer ICU and hospital stay. On the PSH-AM 57.9% (n = 11) scored a probable paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH), 36.8% (n = 7) scored possible, and 5.2% (n = 1) scored unlikely. The review yielded 30 articles. The incidence of autonomic dysregulation after TBI varied from 7.7-32.6% (mean 13.5%). TBI patients with autonomic dysregulation had a longer ICU stay and poorer outcome. Conclusion: Patients with DAI and autonomic dysregulation had a longer ICU stay and a poorer outcome compared to patients without autonomic dysregulation. The PSH-AM is a potential valuable tool to determine the likelihood of autonomic dysregulation. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available