4.5 Article

The clinical significance of HOXA9 promoter hypermethylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22873

Keywords

diagnosis; HNSCC; HOXA9; metastasis; methylation

Funding

  1. Ningbo Natural Science Foundation [2015A610221, 2017A610236]
  2. Scientific Innovation Team Project of Ningbo [2012B82019]
  3. Ningbo Health Branding Subject Fund [PPXK2018-02]
  4. Medical and Health Research Project of Zhejiang Province [2012ZDA042]
  5. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LY14H160003]
  6. Medical and Health Training Project of Zhejiang Province [2014PYA017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The purpose of the current study was to assess the association between HOXA9 (homeobox A9) promoter methylation and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and its diagnostic value. Methods Quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) was applied to measure HOXA9 promoter methylation levels in 145 paired HNSCC and corresponding normal tissue samples. Data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (n = 578; 528 HNSCC and 50 normal) were also analyzed. Results Significantly higher levels of HOXA9 promoter methylation were detected in HNSCC, compared with normal, tissues (our cohort: P = 1.06E-35; TCGA cohort: P = 3.06E-39). Moreover, HOXA9 methylation was significantly increased in patients with advanced tumor (T) stage, lymph node metastasis, and advanced clinical stage. Areas under the receiver characteristic curves (AUCs) based on our cohort and TCGA data were 0.930 and 0.967, respectively. Conclusion In summary, our study reveals that HOXA9 promoter hypermethylation contributes to the risk of HNSCC and its progression and metastasis. Additionally, HOXA9 hypermethylation is a potential biomarker for the early diagnosis and screening of patients with HNSCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available