4.5 Article

Enzootic Arbovirus Surveillance in Forest Habitat and Phylogenetic Characterization of Novel Isolates of Gamboa Virus in Panama

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages 786-793

Publisher

AMER SOC TROP MED & HYGIENE
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0445

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Robert E. Shope International Fellowship Award - American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
  2. James W. McLaughlin Endowment fund
  3. National Research Investigator Board (SNI) of the Secretariat for Science, Technology and Innovation of Panama (SENACYT)
  4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [DW33-92296801-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Landscape changes occurring in Panama, a country whose geographic location and climate have historically supported arbovirus transmission, prompted the hypothesis that arbovirus prevalence increases with degradation of tropical forest habitats. Investigations at four variably degraded sites revealed a diverse array of potential mosquito vectors, several of which are known vectors of arbovirus pathogens. Overall, 675 pools consisting of 25,787 mosquitoes and representing 29 species from nine genera (collected at ground and canopy height across all habitats) were screened for cytopathic viruses on Vero cells. We detected four isolates of Gamboa virus (family: Bunyaviridae; genus: Ortho-bunyavirus) from pools of Aedeomyia squamipennis captured at canopy level in November 2012. Phylogenetic characterization of complete genome sequences shows the new isolates to be closely related to each other with strong evidence of reassortment among the M segment of Panamanian Gamboa isolates and several other viruses of this group. At the site yielding viruses, Soberania National Park in central Panama, 18 mosquito species were identified, and the predominant taxa included A. squamipennis, Coquillettidia nigricans, and Mansonia titillans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available