4.7 Article

Exergy, environ-economic and economic analyses of a tubular solar water heater assisted solar still

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 212, Issue -, Pages 630-646

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.015

Keywords

Solar still; Tubular solar heater; Exergy analysis; Enviro-economic analysis; Economic analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Active solar stills are well known for their higher amount of distillate production than conventional stills. In this paper, a tubular solar collector assisted solar still was suggested for desalting saline water. Its exergy performance, enviro-economic and economic analysis has been carried out. The obtained findings were compared to a simple solar still of similar dimensions. Results revealed that the annual yield of the traditional and modified solar stills was estimated to be similar to 405.04 and similar to 549.77 kg/m(2). The hourly exergy efficiency and global exergy efficiency of the passive system attained similar to 7 and similar to 30% and similarly for the active system similar to 11 and similar to 41%, respectively. The economic analysis shows that distilled water cost is minimum when the interest rate and the lifespan are 5% and 30 yrs, respectively, for the simple solar still (i.e. similar to 0.018 $/L), while under same conditions, it reaches similar to 0.036 $/L in case of improved still. Further, the payback period of the passive and active solar distillers was estimated to be around 7,7 yrs and 21 yrs, respectively, based on the lowest interest rate (5%) and selling price of distilled water of 0.04 $/L. The environmental cost parameter (Z(CO2)) comes out to be similar to 4.42 $/annum on the basis of exergy for the active solar unit. It can be concluded that high distilled water production and less space occupancy are making the enhanced solar unit competitive and feasible. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available