4.6 Article

SOLVING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SELECTION PROBLEM BY A NEW UNCERTAIN WEIGHTING AND RANKING BASED ON COMPROMISE SOLUTION WITH LINEAR ASSIGNMENT APPROACH

Journal

JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 241-251

Publisher

VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECH UNIV
DOI: 10.3846/jcem.2019.8656

Keywords

construction project selection problem; experts' weights; interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets; compromise solution; incomplete information; linear assignment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selecting a suitable construction project is a significant issue for contractors to decrease their costs. In real cases, the imprecise and uncertain information lead to decisions made based on vagueness. Fuzzy sets theory could help decision makers (DMs) to address incomplete information. However, this article develops a new integrated multi-criteria group decision-making model based on compromise solution and linear assignment approaches with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFSs). IVIFSs by presenting a membership and non-membership degree for each candidate based on appraisement criteria could decrease the vagueness of selection decisions. The proposed algorithm involves a new decision process under uncertain conditions to determine the importance of criteria and DMs, separately. In this regard, no subjective or additional information is needed for this process; only the input information required is an alternative assessment matrix. In this approach, weights of criteria and DMs are specified based on novel indexes to increase the reliability of obtained results. In this respect, the criteria' weights are computed regarding entropy concepts. The basis for calculating the weight of each DM is the distance between each DM and an average of the DMs' community. Furthermore, the linear assignment model is extended to rank the candidates. A case study about the construction project selection problem (CPSP) is illustrated to indicate the application of proposed model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available