4.2 Article

Beyond maps: a review of the applications of biological records

Journal

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 115, Issue 3, Pages 532-542

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/bij.12517

Keywords

biodiversity; citizen science; climate change; distribution change; range shift; richness; species trends

Funding

  1. Joint Nature Conservation Committee
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NEC04932]
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh020002, ceh020004] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [ceh020004, ceh020002] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biological records are one of the most important sources of data for a large number of research areas. For example, their application has made valuable contributions to climate change ecology, where they are used to monitor species range shifts; to conservation ecology, where they are used to assess species' Red List status; and to biogeography, where they are used to highlight hotspots of biodiversity. A major benefit of biological records is the large spatial extent of the coverage combined with the fine spatial precision of the data: this combination is essential for any ecologist hoping to address large-scale questions about biodiversity and environmental change. Because most biological records are collected by a vast pool of volunteer recorders, studies utilizing biological records have the advantage of large-scale long-term data that it would otherwise be unfeasibly expensive to collect. We review the application of biological records by focussing on four key areas of biodiversity research: biogeography, trend assessments, climate change ecology, and conservation biology. We showcase the diversity of insights that biological records have delivered, which in turn illustrates the contribution of the voluntary recording community to our understanding of biodiversity science.(c) 2015 The Linnean Society of London.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available