4.7 Article

Nonthermal rate constants for CH4* + X → CH3 + HX, X = H, O, OH, and O2

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 150, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5090394

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences through Argonne National Laboratory
  2. U.S. Department of Energy laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. Argonne-Sandia Consortium on High-Pressure Combustion Chemistry [ANL FWP 59044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quasiclassical trajectories are used to compute nonthermal rate constants, k*, for abstraction reactions involving highly-excited methane CH4* and the radicals H, O, OH, and O-2. Several temperatures and internal energies of methane, E-vib, are considered, and significant nonthermal rate enhancements for large E-vib are found. Specifically, when CH4* is internally excited close to its dissociation threshold (E-vib approximate to D-0 = 104 kcal/mol), its reactivity with H, O, and OH is shown to be collision-rate-limited and to approach that of comparably-sized radicals, such as CH3, with k* > 10(-10) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1). Rate constants this large are more typically associated with barrierless reactions, and at 1000 K, this represents a nonthermal rate enhancement, k*/k, of more than two orders of magnitude relative to thermal rate constants k. We show that large nonthermal rate constants persist even after significant internal cooling, with k*/k > 10 down to E-vib approximate to D-0/4. The competition between collisional cooling and nonthermal reactivity is studied using a simple model, and nonthermal reactions are shown to account for up to 35%-50% of the fate of the products of H + CH3 = CH4* under conditions of practical relevance to combustion. Finally, the accuracy of an effective temperature model for estimating k* from k is quantified. Published under license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available