4.7 Article

Facile synthesis of hydrated magnesium vanadium bronze σ-Mg0.25V2O5•H2O as a novel cathode material for lithium-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 777, Issue -, Pages 931-938

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.054

Keywords

sigma-Mg0.25V2O5 center dot H2O; Long-term cyclic stability; Cathode material; Lithium-ion batteries; Vanadium bronze

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51572284]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences [2018288]
  3. Science Foundation for Youth Scholar of State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructures [SKL201703]
  4. Shanghai Pujiang Program [18PJD051]
  5. Key Research and Development Plan of Anhui Province [1804a09020061]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Square block-like sigma-Mg0.25V2O5 center dot H2O with an open layered framework has been successfully synthesized via a facile hydrothermal method. The entire synthetic process is efficient and economically beneficial. As a cathode material for lithium-ion batteries, the hydrated magnesium vanadium bronze exhibits a high reversible capacity and excellent cycling stability at high current rates. High discharge capacities of 294.2 and 221 mA h g(-1) can be obtained at the current densities of 20 and 100 mA g(-1), respectively. Meanwhile, the electrode achieves a capacity retention of 87.12% after 100 cycles at 100 mA g(-1) and has an excellent long-term cyclic stability with an average decay of 0.053% per cycle over 400 cycles at 800 mA g(-1). The structural stability and impedance variation of the sigma-Mg0.25V2O5 center dot H2O electrodes upon cycling have also been investigated. The excellent electrochemical performance suggests that the layered Mg0.25V2O5 center dot H2O could be a promising candidate for the cathode material of lithium-ion batteries. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available