4.7 Article

Effect of microalloying on crystallization behavior, magnetic properties and bending ductility of high Fe content FeSiBCuPC alloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 777, Issue -, Pages 499-505

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.029

Keywords

Fe-based amorphous alloys; Amorphous forming ability; Saturation magnetization; Bending ductility

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51575112, 50971046]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20124420110007]
  3. Demonstration Dase Fund for Joint Training Graduate of Guangdong Province [2013JDXM28]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Effect of microalloying on microstructure, magnetic properties and bending ductility of the Fe85.7-85.8Si0.5B9-9.3P3.5-4Cu0.5-0.8C0.2-0.3 alloy ribbons with high Fe content was systematically investigated. It is found that the substitution of 0.1 at. % Cu or 0.2 at. % Cu for (B+P) content inhibits the crystallization and improves the amorphous forming ability of melt-spun Fe85.7-85.8Si0.5B9-9.3P3.5-3.9Cu0.6-0.7C0.2-0.3 alloys. The first crystallization temperature (T-x1) increases slightly with the addition of C or P content, while the second crystallization temperature (T-x2) exhibits a slightly decrease. All amorphous alloys exhibit a large temperature interval between T-x1 and T-x2, which contributes to the thermal stability and leads to the formation of a single alpha-Fe phase. In the as-spun state, the amorphous alloys have good bending ductility even at high Fe content. After the optimum heat treatments, the Fe85.7-85.8Si0.5B9-9.3P3.5-3.9Cu0.6-0.7C0.2-0.3 nanocrystalline alloys exhibits the excellent soft magnetic properties, such as the highest Ms of 206.4-210.2 emu/g (Bs approximate to 1.95-1.98 T) and the lowest Hc of 6.5-8.4 A/m. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available