4.7 Article

High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves neurocognitive function in bipolar disorder

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 246, Issue -, Pages 851-856

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.102

Keywords

Bipolar disorder; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Cognitive function

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81771463]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) present widespread and significant neurocognitive impairments during all stages of the disorder. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been used to improve clinical outcomes in common psychiatric diseases, such as depression, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, and BD. Whether rTMS can improve cognitive function in BD patients remains unclear. The present study explored the regulatory effects of rTMS on cognitive function in patients with BD. Methods: Fifty-two eligible subjects with BD were randomly assigned to receive active or sham rTMS via highspeed magnetic stimulator with a figure-of-eight coil for 10 consecutive days. In the active rTMS group, a total of 25,000 stimuli were applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 110% of the motor threshold. The sham group received corresponding sham stimulation. Clinical manifestations and cognitive functions were assessed using a modified 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), and the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Results: Ten consecutive days of high-frequency active rTMS improved scores on the Wechsler Memory Scale-III Spatial Span, and the MCCB Category Fluency subtest, without intolerable adverse effects. No significant differences in HDRS or YMRS scores were found between groups. Limitations: No follow-up after the intervention. The effect of the drug on cognitive function in subjects was not excluded. Conclusions: Short-term rTMS can improve cognitive function in BD patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available