4.7 Article

Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Probable Dementia A Randomized Clinical Trial

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 321, Issue 6, Pages 553-561

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.21442

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  4. National Institute on Aging
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [HHSN268200900040C, HHSN268200900046C, HHSN268200900047C, HHSN268200900048C, HHSN268200900049C]
  6. US Department of Veterans Affairs
  7. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging
  8. Kulynych Family Foundation
  9. Oristano Family Foundation
  10. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: Case Western Reserve University [UL1TR000439]
  11. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: Ohio State University [UL1RR025755]
  12. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: University of Pennsylvania [UL1RR024134, UL1TR000003]
  13. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: Stanford University [UL1TR000093]
  14. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: Tufts Medical Center [UL1RR025752]
  15. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR000073, UL1TR001064]
  16. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: University of Illinois [UL1TR000050]
  17. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: University of Pittsburgh [UL1TR000005]
  18. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center [9U54TR000017-06]
  19. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: University of Utah [UL1TR000105-05]
  20. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: Vanderbilt University [UL1 TR000445]
  21. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: George Washington University [UL1TR000075]
  22. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: University of California, Davis [UL1 TR000002]
  23. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: University of Florida [UL1 TR000064]
  24. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: University of Michigan [UL1TR000433]
  25. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: Tulane University: COBRE Award NIGMS [P30GM103337]
  26. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: Wake Forest Claude Pepper Center [2P30AG021332]
  27. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: Wake Forest University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center [P30 AG049638]
  28. [A-HL-13-002-001]
  29. [R01-AG055606]
  30. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [ZIAAG007480] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IMPORTANCE There are currently no proven treatments to reduce the risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of intensive blood pressure control on risk of dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized clinical trial conducted at 102 sites in the United States and Puerto Rico among adults aged 50 years or older with hypertension but without diabetes or history of stroke. Randomization began on November 8, 2010. The trial was stopped early for benefit on its primary outcome (a composite of cardiovascular events) and all-cause mortality on August 20, 2015. The final date for follow-up of cognitive outcomes was July 22, 2018. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to a systolic blood pressure goal of either less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment group; n = 4678) or less than 140 mm Hg (standard treatment group; n = 4683). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary cognitive outcome was occurrence of adjudicated probable dementia. Secondary cognitive outcomes included adjudicated mild cognitive impairment and a composite outcome of mild cognitive impairment or probable dementia. RESULTS Among 9361 randomized participants (mean age, 67.9 years; 3332 women [35.6%]), 8563 (91.5%) completed at least 1 follow-up cognitive assessment. The median intervention period was 3.34 years. During a total median follow-up of 5.11 years, adjudicated probable dementia occurred in 149 participants in the intensive treatment group vs 176 in the standard treatment group (7.2 vs 8.6 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.04). Intensive BP control significantly reduced the risk of mild cognitive impairment (14.6 vs 18.3 cases per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95) and the combined rate of mild cognitive impairment or probable dementia (20.2 vs 24.1 cases per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.97). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among ambulatory adults with hypertension, treating to a systolic blood pressure goal of less than 120 mm Hg compared with a goal of less than 140 mm Hg did not result in a significant reduction in the risk of probable dementia. Because of early study termination and fewer than expected cases of dementia, the study may have been underpowered for this end point.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available