Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 212, Issue 6, Pages 1175-1182Publisher
EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.017
Keywords
Lung cancer; Lobectomy; Segmentectomy; Robotic surgery; Outcomes; Pulmonary function
Categories
Funding
- Scholarly Concentrations Program at the University of South Florida (USF) Health Morsani College of Medicine
- Summer Program for the Advancement of Research Knowledge (SPARK) at the Moffitt Cancer Center
Ask authors/readers for more resources
BACKGROUND: Lobectomy is standard treatment for early-stage lung cancer, but sublobar resection remains debated. We compared outcomes after robotic-assisted video-assisted thoracoscopic (R-VATS) segmentectomy vs lobectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 251 consecutive patients who underwent RVATS lobectomy (n = 208) or segmentectomy (n = 43) by a single surgeon over 36 months. Pulmonary function tests and perioperative outcomes were compared using Chi-squared test, unpaired Student t test, or Kruskal-Wallis test, with significance at P <=.05. RESULTS: Intraoperative complications were not significantly different, but median operative times were longer for R-VATS segmentectomies (P<.01). Postoperative complications were not significantly different, except for increased rates of pneumothorax after chest tube removal (P=.032) and of effusions or empyema (P=.011) after R-VATS segmentectomies. Predicted changes for forced expiratory volume in 1 second and diffusion constant of the lung for carbon monoxide are significantly less after R-VATS segmentectomy (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: R-VATS segmentectomy should be considered as an alternative to lobectomy for conserving lung function in respiratory-compromised lung cancer patients, although oncologic efficacy remains undetermined. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available