4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Hydrogen separation from blended natural gas and hydrogen by Pd-based membranes

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 44, Issue 55, Pages 29092-29099

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.044

Keywords

Hydrogen purification; Pd-based membranes; Blending; Natural gas; Hydrogen

Funding

  1. EPSRC Supergen Energy Storage Hub [EP/L019469/1]
  2. STFC Early Career Award [ST/N002385/1]
  3. Birmingham Science City Hydrogen Energy projects
  4. EPSRC [EP/L019469/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. STFC [ST/N002385/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrogen separation membranes based on a heated metal foil of a palladium alloy, offer excellent permeability for hydrogen as a result of the solution-diffusion mechanism. Here, the possibility to separate hydrogen from the mixture of Natural Gas (NG) and hydrogen (NG+H-2) with various NG concentrations using Pd, PdCu53 and PdAg24 hydrogen purification membranes is demonstrated. Hydrogen concentrations above similar to 25% (for Pd and PdCu53) and similar to 15% (for PdAg24) were required for the hydrogen separation to proceed at 400 degrees C and 5 bar pressure differential. Hydrogen permeability of the studied alloys could be almost fully recovered after switching the feed gas to pure hydrogen, indicating no significant interaction between the natural gas components and the membranes surface at the current experimental condition. Hydrogen flux of the membranes at various pressure differential was measured and no changes in the hydrogen permeation mechanism could be noticed under (NG 50%+H-2) mixture. The hydrogen separation capability of the membranes is suggested to be mainly controlled by the operating temperature and the hydrogen partial pressure. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available