4.7 Article

Laminar burning characteristics of premixed methane-dissociated methanol-diluent mixtures

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 44, Issue 21, Pages 11097-11110

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.080

Keywords

Dissociated methanol; Methane; Diluent; Carbon monoxide; Laminar burning velocity; Flame stability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50806051]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Engines, Tianjin University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of dissociated methanol (DM) and diluent (CO2 and N-2) addition on methane was investigated in a constant volume chamber under initial conditions of 3 bar and 343 K. CO was also added in separate proportions instead of DM under the same conditions to assess its effect. The laminar burning velocity, Markstein length and flame instability were analyzed systematically under various equivalence ratios (0.8-1.4), dissociated methanol gas ratios (40 and 80%), CO ratios (40 and 80%) and dilution ratios (0-15%). Furthermore, the flame speed of the fuel mixture and the production rate of key reactants were analyzed based on the calculation results of the Aramco Mech 2.0 mechanism to determine the influence principles of dilution. The results show that dissociated methanol gas increases the flame speed of the mixtures and promotes instability of the flame, and H-2 is the dominant component in enhancing the combustion process. Within the dilution ratio range of this study, the diluents decrease the laminar burning velocity of the mixtures since the addition of diluent gas decreases the concentration of key reactants, such as H and OH. The addition of diluent gas can inhibit the flame instability, but the effect is not clear. Compared with N-2, the effect of CO2 is more significant. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available