4.7 Article

Numerical modeling of hot gas ingestion into the rotor-stator disk cavities of a subscale 1.5-stage axial gas turbine

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 1016-1031

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.10.136

Keywords

Computational Fluid Dynamic; Gas turbine; Ingestion; Turbulence modeling; Rotor-stator disk cavity

Funding

  1. Solar Turbines Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Both steady and unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) techniques coupled with the k - epsilon and k - omega (SST) turbulence models are utilized to study the flow characteristics and hot gas ingestion through rim seal in a subscale 1.5-stage axial gas turbine. A scalar transport equation is solved for a tracer gas to represent the coolant flow interaction with the main stream flow. To validate the numerical methodology, radial pressure and sealing effectiveness distributions are compared with the experimental data. The k - omega (SST) turbulence model has the capability to predict secondary flow characteristics, reattachment and separation, thus leading to better agreement with the experimental data. Both radial and circumferential pressure distributions are analyzed to get deeper insight into rotationally and externally induced ingress mechanisms. The circumferential pressure peak-to-trough amplitude is significantly attenuated in the cavity region compared to annulus region. Finally, different purge flow rates and rotational speeds are examined. Results indicate that as purge flow rate increases, the static pressure in the disk cavity region raises remarkably and consequently the sealing effectiveness improves. Averaged sealing effectiveness in the rim cavity decreases linearly with the rotational speed. To visualize different mechanisms of ingestion, streamline and flow field are shown. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available