4.7 Article

Thermal fluid characteristics of pulsating heat pipe in radially rotating thin pad

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 131, Issue -, Pages 273-290

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.10.132

Keywords

Pulsating heat pipe; Radial rotation; Rotating machinery cooling

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C. [NSC102-2221-E-022-005-MY3, MOST 107-2622-8-006-015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thermal performances of a radially rotating pulsating heat pipe (RPHP) formulated by the interconnected 1 x 4 mm(2) channels in the thin pad were investigated. With the 50% filling ratio of water and the specific geometric configurations, the selected parameters controlling the thermal-fluid phenomena by the present study were boiling number (Bn), dimensionless centrifugal acceleration (Omega) and thermal resistance of condenser (R-th,R-cond). The vapor-liquid flow images, heat transfer rates and thermal resistances of the pad-type RPHP were detected at the rotor speeds of 0, 100, 300 and 500 rev/min. The matrix of test conditions was formulated by four Bn, four R-th,R-cond and four Omega for both sets of flow visualization and heat transfer tests. As Omega increased from 0 to 27.8, the intermittent vapor slugs gradually deformed toward the tiny bubbles to incur the respective Nusselt number reductions and elevations over the evaporator and condenser of the RPHP. As the dominance of condenser heat transfer rate in constructing the overall thermal resistance (R-th) took precedence to its evaporator counterpart, the increases of Omega led to the R-th reductions for the present RPHP. The empirical correlations using Bn, Omega and R-th,R-con as the controlling parameters were devised to evaluate R-th and the regionally averaged Nusselt numbers over the evaporator and condenser of the present RPHP for relevant applications. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available