4.4 Article

Surgical management of rectal carcinoids: trends and outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1988 to 2012)

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 211, Issue 5, Pages 877-885

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.008

Keywords

Carcinoid; Neuroendocrine tumor; Rectum; Outcomes; Epidemiology; Transanal excision

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Local excision of small (< 10 mm) rectal carcinoids is a standard treatment. Actual patterns of care and outcomes are understudied because of the rarity of this tumor. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1988 to 2012) was interrogated for rectal carcinoid patients. Chi-square testing and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to compare survival outcomes. RESULTS: Of all, 11,329 patients were identified-9,605 with only localized disease. The majority (77%) underwent local excision only. Full rectal resection was performed more frequently for tumors greater than 10 mm (11.7% to 12.2%) than for tumors less than 10 mm (4.5% to 4.9%, P <. 001), and for higher T stage (T1: 4.0%, T2: 11.4%, T3/4: 30.4%, P < .001). Nonoperative management was more common after year 2000 (11.2% to 13.7%) than prior (7.4% to 8.5%, P <. 001). Cancer-specific survival improved across time periods but did not differ between nonoperative, local excision, or surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS: Nonexcisional management of small, localized rectal carcinoids is becoming more common and may offer equivalent survival to excision or resection. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc.All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available