4.6 Article

Experimental studies on mass transfer performance for CO2 absorption into aqueous N,N-dimethylethanolamine (DMEA) based solutions in a PTFE hollow fiber membrane contactor

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages 210-217

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.12.011

Keywords

Carbon dioxide; Hollow fiber membrane contactor; PTFE; DMEA; Blended amines

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21536003, 21706057, 21606078, 51521006]
  2. National Key Technology R&D Program (MOST) [2014BAC18B04]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province in China [2018JJ3033]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province in China [2016GXNSFAA380190]
  5. China Outstanding Engineer Training Plan for Students of Chemical Engineering & Technology in Hunan University (MOE) [2011-40]
  6. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CO2 absorption performance for various blended N,N-dimethylethanolamine (DMEA) solutions in the presence of absorption promoters including Monoethanolamine (MEA), Piperazine (PZ), 2-(Ethylamino)ethanol (EAE), 2-(Methylamino)ethanol (MAE) and 2-Amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) was investigated in terms of CO2 absorption flux by using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) hollow fiber membrane contactor. The experimental results show that the CO2 absorption flux increases with a reasonable increase in liquid velocity, liquid temperature and total amine concentration. Also, the CO2 absorption flux can increase by increasing gas velocity, CO2 partial pressure but decrease with the increased lean CO2 loading. In addition, it can be found that all of the investigated activated amines can improve the CO2 absorption flux of aqueous DMEA solution. For fresh amine solution, the order of CO2 absorption flux for the investigated amine blends can be ranked as: DMEA < DMEA + AMP < DMEA + MEA < DMEA + EAE < DMEA + MAE < DMEA + PZ. By contrast, for the amine solution with CO2 loading of over 0.3 mol/mol, the order has also changed accordingly and can be ranked as: DMEA < DMEA + AMP < DMEA + EAE < DMEA + MAE < DMEA + MEA < DMEA + PZ. The DMEA + PZ mixture presents a significant improvement up to 52.44% in CO2 absorption flux compared to that of single DMEA solution, and can be considered as a promising alternative for CO2 capture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available