4.5 Article

What influences the sustainability of an effective psychosocial intervention for people with dementia living in care homes? A 9 to 12-month follow-up of the perceptions of staff in care homes involved in the WHELD randomised controlled trail

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 674-682

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gps.5066

Keywords

care homes; dementia; interventions; qualitative; staff; sustainability

Funding

  1. Programme Grants for Applied Research [RPPG-060-10133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives The study aims to understand the factors that care home staff felt enabled or hindered them in continuing to use the well-being and health for people with dementia (WHELD) psychosocial approach in their care home and investigate whether there was sustained activity 9 to 12 months after the study ended. Methods This qualitative study is part of a wider clinical trial, which demonstrated effectiveness of a psychosocial intervention on quality of life outcomes and neuropsychiatric symptoms for residents. Forty-seven care home staff within nine care homes in the United Kingdom participated in focus groups, between 9 and 12 months after the intervention had finished. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes and interpret the data. Results The findings highlighted that staff continued to use a range of activities and processes acquired through the research intervention, after the study had ended. Three overarching themes were identified as influential: recognising the value of the approach for residents and staff, being well practiced with sufficient support and opportunity to consolidate skills prior to the withdrawal of the researchers, and taking ownership of the approach to incorporate it as usual care. Conclusions The WHELD approach can be sustained where the value of the approach is recognised, and sufficient support is provided during initial implementation for staff to build skills and confidence for it to become routine care. Further follow-up is required to understand longer term use and the impact for residents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available