4.7 Article

Amelioration in physicochemical properties and single cell performance of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) block copolymer composite membrane using sulfonated carbon nanotubes for intermediate humidity fuel cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 7, Pages 2974-2989

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.4494

Keywords

carbon nanotubes; composite membrane; intermediate relative humidity; proton conductivity; SPEEK

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2017R1A2B4005230]
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy (MOTIE)
  3. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) [20184030202210]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A composite membrane composed of a sulfonated diblock copolymer (SDBC) based on poly(ether ether ketone) blocks copolymerized with partially fluorinated poly(arylene ether sulfone) and sulfonated carbon nanotubes (SCNTs) was fabricated by simple solution casting. Addition of the SCNT filler enhanced the water absorption and proton conductivity of membranes because of the increased per-cluster volume of sulfonic acid groups, at the same time reinforced the membranes' thermal and mechanical properties. The SDBC/SCNT-1.5 membrane exhibited the most improved physicochemical properties among all materials. It obtained a proton conductivity of 10.1 mS/cm at 120 degrees C under 20% relative humidity (RH) which was 2.6 times more improved than the pristine membrane (3.9 mS/cm). Moreover, the single cell performance of the SDBC/SCNT-1.5 membrane at 60 degrees C and 60% RH at ambient pressure exhibited a peak power density of 171 mW/cm(2) at a load current density of 378 mA/cm(2), while the pristine membrane exhibited 119 mW/cm(2) at a load current density of 294 mA/cm(2). Overall, the composite membrane exhibited very promising characteristics to be used as polymer electrolyte membrane in fuel cells operated at intermediate RH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available