4.5 Article

Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) in recurrent pilonidal disease: a prospective international multicenter study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 741-746

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03256-8

Keywords

Pilonidal disease; Recurrent pilonidal sinus; Minimally invasive treatment; Endoscopic treatment; VAAFT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Pilonidal disease (PD) is a common disease of the natal cleft, which can lead to complications including infection and abscess formation. Various operative management options are available, but the ideal technique is still debatable. Recurrent PD after surgical treatment is frequent event for the 25-30% of cases. The present study evaluated endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) in recurrent and multi-recurrent PD. Methods Of the consecutive prospective patients with recurrent PD, 122 were enrolled in a prospective international multicenter study conducted at a secondary and tertiary colorectal surgery centers. Primary endpoint was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes: healing rate/time, morbidity rate, re-recurrence rate, and patient's quality of life (QoL). Results Complete wound healing rate was occurred in 95% of the patient, with a mean complete wound healing time of 29 +/- 12 days. The incomplete healing rate (5%) was significantly related to the number of external openings (p=0.008), and recurrence was reported in six cases (5.1%). Normal daily activity was established on the first postoperative day, and the mean duration before patients returned to work was 3 days. QoL significantly increased between the preoperative stage and 30 days after the EPSiT procedure (45.3 vs. 7.9; p<0.0001). Conclusions The EPSiT procedure seems to be a safe and effective technique in treating even complex recurrent PD. It enables excellent short- and long-term outcomes than various other techniques that are more invasive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available