4.7 Review

Laboratory characterisation of fracture compressibility for coal and shale gas reservoir rocks: A review

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY
Volume 204, Issue -, Pages 1-17

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2019.01.010

Keywords

Coalbed methane; Coal seam gas; Gas shale; Cleat; Pore compressibility

Funding

  1. Joint Research Fund for Overseas Chinese Scholars and Scholars in Hong Kong and Macao [41728005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51839003, U1765206]
  3. CSIRO Energy
  4. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unconventional natural gas, including coalbed methane and shale gas, has become important natural gas resources. Coal and shale reservoirs are characterised by low porosity and low permeability and difficult for gas production. These reservoirs are also considered as fractured reservoirs, i.e. the natural fracture/cleat system in coals and bedding direction microfractures in shales. Permeabilities of these reservoirs are sensitive to stress change. During gas production, the pressure drawdown significantly increases effective stress, and thus decreases the absolute permeability. The relationship between permeability and stress is characterised by fracture compressibility, which is difficult and costly to be obtained from the field, but can be acquired easily from laboratory measurement. In this review article, the laboratory methods to obtain fracture compressibility were reviewed. Literature data on fracture compressibility for coals and shales were collated and the relationships between fracture compressibility and pressure, stress and rock properties were discussed. It is found that fracture compressibility is higher for coals than for shales, and the fracture compressibility for proppant supported fracture is even lower than that for the same shale or coal. Moreover, fracture compressibility is variable depending on gas type, gas pressure, and stress. Fracture compressibility has no correlation with absolute permeability in general, but has a weak positive correlation for the same sample.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available