4.7 Article

Periodontal pathogens are a risk factor of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma, independent of tobacco and alcohol and human papillomavirus

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 145, Issue 3, Pages 775-784

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32152

Keywords

microbiome; oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma; periodontal pathogens; leukoplakia; risk factor; nonsmoking; Fusobacterium; streptococcus

Categories

Funding

  1. Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
  2. National Cancer Institute [P30 CA008748, U01CA182370, R01CA204113]
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01DK110014]
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R01AI110372]
  5. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [R21DE025352]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past decade, there has been a change in the epidemiology of oral cavity squamous cell cancer (OC-SCC). Many new cases of OC-SCC lack the recognized risk factors of smoking, alcohol and human papilloma virus. The aim of this study was to determine if the oral microbiome may be associated with OC-SCC in nonsmoking HPV negative patients. We compared the oral microbiome of HPV-negative nonsmoker OC-SCC(n = 18), premalignant lesions(PML) (n = 8) and normal control patients (n = 12). Their oral microbiome was sampled by oral wash and defined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We report that the periodontal pathogens Fusobacterium, Prevotella, Alloprevotella were enriched while commensal Streptococcus depleted in OC-SCC. Based on the four genera plus a marker genus Veillonella for PML, we classified the oral microbiome into two types. Gene/pathway analysis revealed a progressive increase of genes encoding HSP90 and ligands for TLRs 1, 2 and 4 along the controls -> PML -> OC-SCC progression sequence. Our findings suggest an association between periodontal pathogens and OC-SCC in non smoking HPV negative patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available