4.6 Article

Using the Green Solvent Dimethyl Sulfoxide To Replace Traditional Solvents Partly and Fabricating PVC/PVC-g-PEGMA Blended Ultrafiltration Membranes with High Permeability and Rejection

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 58, Issue 16, Pages 6413-6423

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00370

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678377, 51708371]
  2. Sichuan University Outstanding Youth Foundation [2015SCU04A35]
  3. Applied Basic Research of Sichuan Province [2017JY0238]
  4. Key Projects in the Science & Technology Program of Hainan Province [zdkj2016022]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018T110973, 2017M612965]
  6. Brook Byers Institute for Sustainable Systems
  7. Hightower Chair
  8. Georgia Research Alliance at the Georgia Institute of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional solvents are harmful to human health and the environment. Here, we use a green solvent, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), to replace traditional solvents partly as well as improve membrane performance. The amphiphilic copolymer poly(vinyl chloride)-graft-poly (ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (PVC-g-PEGMA) is blended with PVC to improve the membrane performance. PVC cannot dissolve in DMSO, so based on the Hansen solubility parameter calculation, we investigated the mixture solvents of traditional solvents and DMSO. We found that membranes fabricated by solvent 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP)/N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc)/DMSO = 4/3/3 had the highest pure water flux of 891.54 +/- 64.41 L m(-2) h(-1) bar(-1) and the highest sodium alginate (SA) rejection of 94.7 +/- 1.3%. Other studies have rarely reported modified PVC membranes with such good performance. This membrane was a successful attempt to use a green solvent in membrane fabrication, meeting the challenges of sustainability in chemical enterprises.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available