4.8 Article

Survival of Single Positive Thymocytes Depends upon Developmental Control of RIPK1 Kinase Signaling by the IKK Complex Independent of NF-κB

Journal

IMMUNITY
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 348-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.01.004

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Belgian (Interuniversity Attraction Poles) [IAP 7/32, EOS 30826052 MODEL-IDI]
  2. Flemish (Research Foundation Flanders) [FWO G.0875.11, G.0973.11, G.0A45.12N, G.0787.13N, G.0C31.14N, G.0C37.14N, G.0E04.16N, G.0C76.18N, G.0B71.18N]
  3. Methusalem grant [BOF16/MET_V/007]
  4. Ghent University (MRP, GROUP-ID consortium)
  5. Foundation against Cancer [2012-188, FAF-F/2016/865]
  6. VIB
  7. Medical Research Council UK [MC_PC_13055, MR/P011225/1]
  8. MRC [MR/P011225/1, MC_PC_13055] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NF-kappa B(nuclear factor kappa B) signaling is considered critical for single positive (SP) thymocyte development because loss of upstream activators of NF-kappa B, such as the IKK complex, arrests their development. We found that the compound ablation of RelA, cRel, and p50, required for canonical NF-kappa B transcription, had no impact upon thymocyte development. While IKK-deficient thymocytes were acutely sensitive to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-induced cell death, Rel-deficient cells remained resistant, calling into question the importance of NF-kappa B as the IKK target required for thymocyte survival. Instead, we found that IKK controlled thymocyte survival by repressing cell-death-inducing activity of the serine/threonine kinase RIPK1. We observed that RIPK1 expression was induced during development of SP thymocytes and that IKK was required to prevent RIPK1-kinase-dependent death of SPs in vivo. Finally, we showed that IKK was required to protect Rel-deficient thymocytes from RIPK1-dependent cell death, underscoring the NF-kappa B-independent function of IKK during thymic development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available