4.7 Article

Dynamic Co-Simulation Methods for Combined Transmission-Distribution System With Integration Time Step Impact on Convergence

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 1171-1181

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2874807

Keywords

Co-simulation; combined transmission and distribution system; dynamics; convergence; FIDVR

Funding

  1. Department of Energy
  2. Electric Power Research Center at Iowa State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combined transmission and distribution systems (CoTDS) simulation for power systems requires development of algorithms and software that are numerically stable and at the same time accurately simulate dynamic events that can occur in practical systems. The time scales of simulation can be orders of magnitude apart making the combined simulation extremely challenging. This has led to increased research in applying co-simulation techniques for integrated simulation of the two systems. In this paper, two methods for dynamic co-simulation of CoTDS are proposed using parallel and series computation of the transmission system and distribution systems. The convergence of numerical methods in co-simulation is addressed from a fundamental mathematical perspective and the impact of the integration time-step is studied on proposed CoTDS dynamic co-simulation methods. Both these co-simulation methods are validated against total system simulation in a single time-domain simulation environment. The proposed CoTDS co-simulation method is also validated against commercial EMTP dynamic simulation. CoTDS dynamic co-simulation is further demonstrated on a New England 39-bus transmission system with ten load buses replaced by distribution systems including a 5780-node distribution system on one load bus for a detailed fault-induced delayed voltage recovery simulation study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available