4.7 Article

A Computationally Efficient Method for Bounding Impacts of Multiple Uncertain Parameters in Dynamic Load Models

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 897-907

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2879102

Keywords

Dynamic load modeling; multiple parameter uncertainty; power system stability; trajectory sensitivity

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017K1A4A3013579]
  2. Human Resources Program in Energy Technology of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), from the Ministry of Trade, Industry&Energy, Republic of Korea [20174030201540]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops a computationally efficient method to bound the impact of multiple uncertain parameters in a dynamic load model. Load model trajectory sensitivity is first conducted on regional dynamics only (e.g., a large industrial load bus and its model for adequately representing the bus voltage dynamics) to identify critical and correlated load parameters. Systemwide trajectory sensitivity on the entire power system model is then evaluated for this reduced set of parameters, and finally, the impact of multiple uncertain parameters on the representation of power system dynamics is bounded. To reinforce this reasoning, we elaborate on the conceptual meaning of the load model trajectory sensitivity, its implication, and its applicability to the entire power grid analysis. This research also develops a fluctuation index of trajectory sensitivity to effectively rank and select the model parameters based on the impact of their perturbations on the system's dynamic performance. Case studies for the Korean power system demonstrate the validity and efficacy of the developed methods for adequately bounding the uncertainty impacts with reference to the comprehensive time-domain dynamic simulation approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available