4.8 Article

Alternative Ranking-Based Clustering and Reliability Index-Based Consensus Reaching Process for Hesitant Fuzzy Large Scale Group Decision Making

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 159-171

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2876655

Keywords

Alternative ranking-based clustering (ARC); consensus reaching process (CRP); large scale group decision making (LSGDM); reliability index (RI)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71471056, 71871085]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201706710084]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, large scale group decision making (LSGDM) problems have become a hotspot. This paper focuses on hesitant fuzzy LSGDM problems where decision makers (DMs) use hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRs) to express their assessment information. HFPRs can represent the fuzziness and hesitancy of DM assessment information well. To improve the efficiency of hesitant fuzzy LSGDM problems, we first propose a reliability index-based consensus reaching process (RI-CRP). By assessing the ordinal consistency of DM's assessment information and measuring the deviation from collective opinion, the DM's opinion reliability index is given. To avoid unreliable information, we propose an unreliable DM management method to be used in the RI-CRP, based on the computation of DM's opinion reliability index. Moreover, an alternative ranking-based clustering (ARC) method with HFPRs is proposed to improve the efficiency of the RI-CRP. The similarity index between two DMs' opinions is provided to ensure the ARC method can be effectively implemented. Compared with those clustering methods which need to preset several correlated parameters, the presented ARC method is more objective with a different approach based on the alternative ranking. A numerical example shows that the proposed ARC method and the RI-CRP are feasible and effective for hesitant fuzzy LSGDM problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available