4.7 Article

On the Mahalanobis Distance Classification Criterion for a Ventricular Septal Defect Diagnosis System

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages 2665-2674

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2882582

Keywords

VSD; STMHT; PCA; GMM; Mahalanobis distance; chi(2)(m) distribution

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571371]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the Mahalanobis distance classification criterion combined with principal component analysis (PCA)-based heart sound features generation is proposed for diagnosing three-type ventricular septal defects (VSDs): small VSDs (SVSDs), moderate VSDs (MVSDs), and large VSDs (LVSDs). The three stages corresponding to the diagnostic system implementation are summarized as follows. In the first stage, the heart sound is collected via a stethoscope and filtered using the wavelet decomposition. In the second stage, the time-domain features [t(12), t(11)] are first extracted from a time-domain envelope E-T for the filtered heart sound (S-T), and the frequency-domain features [f(g), f(w)] are subsequently extracted from a frequency-domain envelope E-F for one-period S-T, which is automatically segmented from heart sounds via the short time modified Hilbert transform. And then, the PCA-based diagnostic features gamma(1) and gamma(2) for the features (TFF = [t(12), t(11), f(g), f(w)]) extracted from SVSD, MVSD, LVSD, and normal sounds (NM) are generated and expressed as the mean and standard deviation [-2.41 +/- 0.49, 2.16 +/- 0.45], [-1.87 +/- 0.35, 0.22 +/- 0.33], [-1.63 +/- 0.56, -2.11 +/- 0.68], and [1.11 +/- 0.43, 0.09 +/- 0.43], respectively. In the third stage, The Gaussian mixture models for the features [gamma(1), gamma(2)] are first built, and then the Mahalanobis distance classification criterion-based diagnostic method is defined for diagnosing the VSD and NM. Moreover, to validate the usefulness of the proposed diagnostic system, mitral regurgitation and aortic stenosis sounds are used as examples for detection analysis. As comparative accuracies with other well-known classifiers, the higher classification accuracies achieved are 95.5%, 92.1%, 96.2%, and 99.0% for diagnosing SVSD, MVSD, LVSD, and NM, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available