4.5 Article

The Role of Motivation as a Factor in Mental Fatigue

Journal

HUMAN FACTORS
Volume 61, Issue 7, Pages 1171-1185

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0018720819828569

Keywords

time-on-task; effort; distraction; heart rate variability; pupil diameter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess motivation as a factor in mental fatigue using subjective, performance, and physiological measures. Background: Sustained performance on a mentally demanding task can decrease over time. This decrement has two possible causes: a decline in available resources, meaning that performance cannot be sustained, and decrement in motivation, meaning a decline in willingness to sustain performance. However, so far, few experimental paradigms have effectively and continuously manipulated motivation, which is essential to understand its effect on mental fatigue. Method: Twenty participants performed a working memory task with 14 blocks, which alternated between reward and nonreward for 2.5 hr. In the reward blocks, monetary rewards could be gained for good performance. Besides reaction time and accuracy, we used physiological measures (heart rate variability, pupil diameter, eyeblink, eye movements with a video distractor) and subjective measures of fatigue and mental effort. Results: Participants reported becoming fatigued over time and invested more mental effort in the reward blocks. Even though they reported fatigue, their accuracy in the reward blocks remained constant but declined in the nonreward blocks. Furthermore, in the nonreward blocks, participants became more distractable, invested less cognitive effort, blinked more often, and made fewer saccades. These results showed an effect of motivation on mental fatigue. Conclusion: The evidence suggests that motivation is an important factor in explaining the effects of mental fatigue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available