4.6 Article

Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) at room temperature of archaeological wood treated with various consolidants

Journal

HOLZFORSCHUNG
Volume 73, Issue 8, Pages 757-772

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/hf-2018-0235

Keywords

Kauramin; lactitol; PEG; polyethylene-L-tartaramide; rosin; silanes; stiffness of treated wood; waterlogged archaeological wood; wood conservation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The viscoelastic properties of wood samples treated with various consolidants [polyethylene glycols (PEGs), lactitol and trehalose, Kauramin, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and trimethoxymethylsilane (MTMS), rosin and polyethylene-L-tartaramide] were evaluated by means of dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) in order to clarify their effects with regard to the conservation of wood objects. Two softwoods, medium-decayed silver fir (Abies alba) and highly decayed maritime pine (Pines pinaster), and two differently decayed oak hardwoods (Quercus spp.) were used. In addition, the selected parameters [retention, volume variations and equilibrium moisture content (EMC)] were evaluated to assess the consolidation efficacy. The results showed that in treated wood, both the storage modulus and tan delta depend upon the level of degradation. The impact of the consolidating product was greater in more degraded wood (a higher product amount inside the artefact) compared to well-preserved material, where also wood played a role (also when the products were applied at high concentrations). The values of the different viscoelastic parameters also depend upon the ability of the products to interact with the wood matrix; this characteristic is fundamental to the nature of each consolidant. Lactitol-treated samples showed the highest stiffness increases, whereas those treated with selected PEG combinations and rosin displayed noticeable tan delta increases (high dissipative behaviour).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available