4.3 Article

CA3 place cells that represent a novel waking experience are preferentially reactivated during sharp wave-ripples in subsequent sleep

Journal

HIPPOCAMPUS
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 921-938

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23090

Keywords

CA3; hippocampus; place cells; replay; sharp wave-ripples; sleep

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [Career Award #1453756] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [T32 MH106454] Funding Source: Medline
  3. UT Center for Learning and Memory [Training Grant #5T32MH106454-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A popular model of memory consolidation posits that recent memories stored in the hippocampus are reactivated during sleep and thereby transferred to neocortex for long-term storage. This process is thought to occur during sharp wave-ripples (SWRs) in nonrapid eye movement sleep (NREM). However, whether the hippocampus consolidates all recent memories in the same manner remains unclear. An efficient memory system may extract novel information from recent experiences for preferential consolidation. In the hippocampus, memories are thought to be stored initially in CA3. Therefore, CA3 place cells that encode novel experiences may be preferentially reactivated during SWRs in subsequent sleep. To test this hypothesis, we recorded CA3 place cells in rats during exposure to a familiar and a novel environment and during subsequent overnight sleep. We found that CA3 place cells that preferentially coded a novel environment showed larger firing rate increases during SWRs in NREM than place cells that preferentially coded a familiar environment. Moreover, CA3 place cell ensembles replayed trajectories from a novel environment during NREM with higher fidelity than trajectories from a familiar environment. Together, these results suggest that CA3 representations of novel experiences are preferentially processed during subsequent sleep.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available