4.5 Article

Feasibility and safety of needle-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy with lateral neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma: a preliminary experience

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hed.25705

Keywords

papillary thyroid carcinoma; endoscopic thyroidectomy; lateral neck dissection; needle assisted; anterior chest approach

Funding

  1. Guiding Social Development Project of Fujian Province [2018Y0035]
  2. Medical Innovation Project of Fujian Provinc [2018-CX-17]
  3. Professor Academic Development Fund of Fujian Medical Universit [JS15017]
  4. Minimally Invasive Medicine Center of Fujian Province
  5. Startup Fund for scientific research of Fujian Medical University [2017XQ1037]
  6. Youth Research Project in the Health System and Birth Control Commission of Fujian Province [2017-2-22]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Endoscopic thyroidectomy is popular among patients with cosmetic requirements. However, when lateral neck dissection (LND) is required, endoscopic surgery may be challenging. Therefore, we introduced needle-assisted endoscopic technique to achieve endoscopic LND procedure and evaluated its safety and feasibility in the present study. Methods Medical records of 37 patients who underwent needle-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy with LND were retrospectively reviewed. Results All of 37 patients had excellent cosmetic outcomes. The mean operative time was 338.2 +/- 58.74 minutes. Mean number of lymph nodes retrieved in the lateral was 33.5 +/- 11.69 and 15.9 +/- 7.51 in the central neck. The rates of transient and permanent hypocalcemia were 32.4% and 2.7% and the rates of transient and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were 8.1% and 0%, respectively. Conclusions Needle-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy with lateral neck dissection shows potential feasibility but further study is needed to better characterize its safety and applicability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available