4.8 Letter

We need both natural and energy solutions to stabilize our climate

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 1889-1890

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14612

Keywords

climate change; fossil fuel emissions; land use; natural climate solutions; terrestrial ecosystems

Funding

  1. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We respond to concerns raised by Baldocchi and Penuelas who question the potential for ecosystems to provide carbon sinks and storage, and conclude that we should focus on decarbonizing our energy systems. While we agree with many of their concerns, we arrive at a different conclusion: we need strong action to advance both clean energy solutions and natural climate solutions (NCS) if we are to stabilize warming well below 2 degrees C. Cost-effective NCS can deliver 11.3 PgCO(2)e yr(-1) or similar to 30% of near-term climate mitigation needs through protection, improved management, and restoration of ecosystems, as we increase overall ambition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available