4.7 Article

A generalized relationship between thermal conductivity and matric suction of soils

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 337, Issue -, Pages 491-497

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.057

Keywords

Soil thermal conductivity; Matric suction; Prediction error; Soil water retention curve

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds of CAF [CAFYBB2017QC001]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41877019, 41671223, 41371240]
  3. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015CB150403]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The soil thermal conductivity (lambda) and matric suction of soil water (h, the negative of matric potential) relationship has been widely used in land surface models for estimating soil temperature and heat flux following the McCumber and Pielke (1981, MP81) lambda-h model. However, few datasets are available for evaluating the accuracy and feasibility of the MP81 lambda-h model under various soil and moisture conditions. In this study, we developed a new lambda-h model and compared its performance with that of the MP81 model using measurements on 18 soils with a wide range of textures, water contents and bulk densities. The heat pulse technique was used to measure lambda, and the suction table, micro-tensiometers, pressure plate device, and the dew point potentiometer were applied to obtain soil water retention curves at the appropriate suction ranges. In the range of pF (the common logarithm of h in cm) <= 3, the lambda-h relationships were highly nonlinear and varied strongly with soil texture and bulk density. In the dry range (i.e., pF > 3), there existed a universal lambda-h relationship for all soil textures and bulk densities, and an exponential function was established to describe the relationship. Independent evaluations using lambda-h data on five intact soil samples showed that the new model produced accurate lambda data from pF values with root mean square errors (RMSE) with the range of 0.03-0.18 W m(-1) K-1. While, large errors (RMSEs within 0.17-0.36 W m(-1) K-1) were observed with lambda estimates from the MP81 model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available