4.7 Article

Pou5f3, SoxB1, and Nanog remodel chromatin on high nucleosome affinity regions at zygotic genome activation

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 383-395

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.240572.118

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [DFG-ON86/4-1, DFG-ON86/4-2, DFG-EXC294 A7-2]
  2. DFG [SFB 992/1 2012]
  3. BMBF [031 A538A RBC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The zebrafish embryo is transcriptionally mostly quiescent during the first 10 cell cycles, until the main wave of zygotic genome activation (ZGA) occurs, accompanied by fast chromatin remodeling. At ZGA, homologs of the mammalian stem cell transcription factors (TFs) Pou5f3, Nanog, and Sox19b bind to thousands of developmental enhancers to initiate transcription. So far, how these TFs influence chromatin dynamics at ZGA has remained unresolved. To address this question, we analyzed nucleosome positions in wild-type and maternal-zygotic (MZ) mutants for pou5f3 and nanog by MNase-seq. We show that Nanog, Sox19b, and Pou5f3 bind to the high nucleosome affinity regions (HNARs). HNARs are spanning over 600 bp, featuring high in vivo and predicted in vitro nucleosome occupancy and high predicted propeller twist DNA shape value. We suggest a two-step nucleosome destabilization-depletion model, in which the same intrinsic DNA properties of HNAR promote both high nucleosome occupancy and differential binding of TFs. In the first step, already before ZGA, Pou5f3 and Nanog destabilize nucleosomes at HNAR centers genome-wide. In the second step, post-ZGA, Nanog, Pou5f3, and SoxB1 maintain open chromatin state on the subset of HNARs, acting synergistically. Nanog binds to the HNAR center, whereas the Pou5f3 stabilizes the flanks. The HNAR model will provide a useful tool for genome regulatory studies in a variety of biological systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available